On May 26, 2026, during the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted interviews and determined the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates as part of the competition for positions of judges at the High Anti-Corruption Court and its Appeals Chamber.

Based on the results of the session, the Commission took the following decisions:

On May 27, 2026, the First Chamber of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine considered the issue of submitting a recommendation on the secondment of judges to another court of the same level and specialisation for the administration of justice.

In view of the excessive judicial workload identified, the Commission resolved to submit to the High Council of Justice a recommendation for the secondment, for a period of one year, to the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv City of:

In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisat

On May 26, 2026, during the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted interviews and determined the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the positions of judges at the Kyiv Court of Appeal.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:

On May 26, 2026, during the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted interviews and determined the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the positions of judges at the Kharkiv Court of Appeal.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:

In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisat

On May 22, 2026, the Commission hosted an online presentation entitled “Transparent Processes – Confidence in the Outcome: The Practice of the HQCJ” as part of Open Government Week.

Representatives of the Commission’s Secretariat presented practices aimed at ensuring the openness and transparency of judicial career procedures, advancing e-governance, and promoting the digitalisation of the HQCJ’s operational processes.

In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisation to administer justice.

In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisation to administer justice.

On May 21, 2026, during the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted interviews and determined the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the positions of judges at the Kyiv Court of Appeal.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions: