X

Competition for the Lviv Court of Appeal: Two Candidates Are Awaiting an Interview By the Plenary Session of the Commission

On April 30, 2026, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, sitting as a panel, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of two candidates for the positions of judges at the Lviv Court of Appeal were determined.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:

Competition for the Kyiv Court of Appeal: Two Candidates Have Confirmed Their Ability to Administer Justice

On April 30, 2026, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, sitting as a panel, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates for the positions of judges at the Kyiv Court of Appeal were determined.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:

The Issue of Secondment of Judges to Two Courts Has Been Scheduled for Consideration

In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisat

The Commission Has Terminated the Candidate’s Participation In the Competition for the Specialised Circuit Administrative Court

On April 29, 2026, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, in plenary session, considered the issue of terminating the participation of Olha Pevna, a candidate in the competition for vacant positions of judges at the Specialised Circuit Administrative Court.

Based on the result of the session, Olha Pevna withdrew from the competition for the Specialised Circuit Administrative Court.

The Results of Testing On General Knowledge In the Field o Law And Knowledge In the Specialisation of the Relevant Court Within the Competitions for Vacant Positions of Judges in the Specialised Cicuit Administrative Court and the Specialised Administrative Court of Appeal Have Been Approved

On April 29, 2026, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine took a decision approving the coded and decoded results of testing on general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge in the specialisation of the relevant court, completed by the candidates:

Competition for the Odesa Court of Appeal: Three Candidates Have Confirmed Their Ability to Administer Justice

On April 29, 2026, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, in plenary session, considered the issue of confirming the ability of three candidates to administer justice at the Odesa Court of Appeal.

Based on the results of the session, the Commission took the following decisions:

Competition for the Kyiv Court of Appeal: One Candidate Confirmed His Ability to Administer Justice

On April 28, 2026, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, sitting as a panel, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the positions of judges at the Kyiv Court of Appeal were determined.

Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:

Competition for the Lviv Court of Appeal: One Candidate Is Awaiting an Interview By the Plenary Session of the Commission

On April 28, 2026, during the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted interviews and determined the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates for the positions of judges at the Lviv Court of Appeal.

A Report Concerning the Declarations of Integrity of Two Judges Has Been Considered

On April 28, 2026, at the session of the panel of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a report was considered concerning information that may indicate inaccuracies (including incompleteness) in the statements made by judges in their declarations of integrity.

Based on the results of the session, the Commission took the following decisions: