On October 14, 2025, at a session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in Panels, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the positions of judges in the Zaporizhzhia Court of Appeal were determined.
Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:
On October 14, 2025, at a session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in Panels, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates for the positions of judges in the Transcarpathian Court of Appeal were determined.
Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:
Please be informed, that on October 14, 2025, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine took a decision to appoint cognitive abilities testing within the framework of the competition for vacant positions of judges in the High Anti-Corruption Court, announced by the Commission’s decision of June 03, 2025, No. 112/zp -25, and to determine the schedule for its conduction.
The High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine has decided to approve the coded and decoded results of testing general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge in the specialisation of the High Anti-Corruption Court, including its Appeals Chamber, passed on October 13, 2025, within the framework of the competition announced by the Commission’s decision No. 112/zp-25 of June 03, 2025, to fill vacant positions of judges in the High Anti-Corruption Court.
Please be informed, that on October 13, 2025, 141 participants (1 did not show up) took a test of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the High Anti-Corruption Court, including its Appeals Chamber.
The coded test results have been established:
37 persons scored between 113 and 130 points;
47 persons scored between 131 and 140 points;
On October 10, 2025, at a meeting of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in Panel, an interview was conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of a candidate for the position of judge at the Zaporizhzhia Court of Appeal were determined.
According to the results of the qualification assessment, Yuliia Kovalova scored 674.7 points. The Panel decided to submit to the Commission in plenary session the question of confirming the candidate’s ability to administer justice in a general court of appeal.
According to part one of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges”, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisation to administer justice by a decision of the High Council of Justice adopted on the basis of a submission from the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.
To complete the practical assignment in the relevant court’s area of specialisation, participants in the selection process announced on December 11, 2024, will be provided with access to IpLex, a program and database of regulatory, legal, judicial, and reference information.
Offline access will be provided exclusively to the regulatory and legal acts necessary and sufficient for completing the practical task: laws, codes, subordinate regulatory and legal acts, and decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
On October 02, 2025, at a session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in Panels, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of four candidates for the position of judge in the Zaporizhzhia Court of Appeal were determined.
Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:
On October 02, 2025, at a session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in Panels, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of five candidates for the positions of judges in the Chernihiv Court of Appeal were determined.
Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:
