On November 20, 2025, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates for the positions of judges in the Odesa Court of Appeal were determined.
Based on the results of the qualification assessment, the Commission took the following decisions:
In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialisation to administer justice.
In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialis
In accordance with Part 1 of Article 55 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” by decision of the High Council of Justice, adopted on the basis of a submission by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a judge may, with his or her consent, be seconded to another court of the same level and specialis
On November 19, 2025, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a panel conducted an interview and determined the results of the qualification assessment of Vadym Karun, a candidate for the position of judge at the Chernihiv Court of Appeal.
On November 19, 2025, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, a report was considered regarding information that may indicate the inaccuracy (including incompleteness) of the statements made by the judge in his integrity declaration.
On November 19, 2025, the Second Chamber of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine considered an issue of recommending the secondment of a judge to another court of the same level and specialisation for the administration of justice.
On November 18, 2025, at the session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, interviews were conducted and the results of the qualification assessment of three candidates for the positions of judges in the Odesa Court of Appeal were determined.
Recent statements and conclusions appearing in the media in connection with the activities of the Temporary Investigative Commission of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine once again demonstrate an attempt to exert political and informational influence on the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ) – a key body on which the filling of the judiciary with professional and honest personnel directly depends.
On November 05, 2025, at the plenary session of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the issue of confirming the ability of one candidate for the position of judge to administer justice in the Chernihiv Court of Appeal and one candidate in the Transcarpathian Court of Appeal was considered.
Based on the results of the session, the Commission took the following decisions:
